We Them Media logo We Them Media Community-made Back the work →

I am committed to bringing people who care into the conversations that matter, before the retrospective gets written.

We coordinate and act differently depending on what we know. That is the whole thing. Most of what would change how you move is already public. It is just locked behind jargon, or behind hours of research nobody has time for. The gap is not secrecy. It is access. And it is easy to feel disillusioned when you cannot tell what is important, or what a headline actually means.

I studied philosophy. What it taught me is that information and wisdom are what actually give a person power over their own life, and that the fastest way through a problem is to look straight at it and move. The world does not wait. Most of us are going to work. Meanwhile some people are playing Monopoly with the places we go to work, focused on winning and losing sight of the society the board is made of. They are working day and night at it and they are not slowing down. So the rest of us do not get to be passive about understanding.

Plenty of people noticed that gap and built a business on it. Charging for the answer. Selling access to what you are missing. We are doing the opposite: free, in the open, and learning alongside you, because I do not have it figured out either.

I got into crypto wanting to understand what it was. What I found instead was a story I think sits at the center of this moment, and one most people will not recognize until it is hindsight.

I did not learn it at my computer at home. I learned it in rooms, with living, breathing people, in cities I had to travel to. That taught me the thing our coverage is built on: what you know depends on where you are standing. Nobody sees this from nowhere. So if you want the real picture, you go to where people are, ask what it is actually like for them, and publish it in their own voice, so they are spoken with instead of spoken about.

There is a whole world of people moving through this moment that most of the world does not know exists. Nomadic, scattered, building. And that is the actual story. This is not a story about crypto. It is a story about people learning that money is changing, and changing their own lives to meet it. Moving, building, trying to get a hand on a moment of real economic shift while it is still happening.

I do not have it solved. I have questions, and a network of people willing to go ask them on their own streets. Here is what I am carrying into this next chapter.

  1. 01 When a currency stops working for the people using it, what actually fixes that for a whole society? Right now this technology mostly offers a person a way out for themselves. A way out is not a repair. So does everyone leaving force a government to do better, or does it just leave behind the people who could not leave? I have watched the first half of that happen. I want to know how the second half goes.
  2. 02 Can a community actually design its own way out of a problem with this, from the bottom up? Or does money end up steering the vote here the same way it does everywhere else? People are running this experiment right now, in real places, with real budgets. Some of it is working better than the headlines suggest. Some of it has quietly stopped working and nobody has said so. I want to sit in those rooms and find out which is which.
  3. 03 Ethereum calls itself an infinite garden and talks about funding public goods. Does it get there, or does it stop at internet money? Most of what runs on it today is money. That might already be bigger than it sounds, because those rails carry people the banking system skipped and no bank had to approve any of them. It is still not the commons anyone was promised. I want to know which way it breaks.
  4. 04 What is this technology actually necessary for? The countries held up as proof that it belongs in public infrastructure won something else first. They built good digital government over decades and kept the political will to finish it. Credit the decades before you credit the tool. I would rather go find the places where this is doing work nothing else could do.
  5. 05 And for people who are broke in America: is there anything real in here for us, or is it just another casino? Every question above is about somewhere else. This one is about home. The pitch to poor people in this country has mostly been gambling – buy this coin, hold it, get lucky, tell your cousin. I am not interested in that. I want to know what is left when you take the gambling out. Ownership that does not need a bank to vouch for you. A block funding its own thing without waiting on a grant. Money getting home without three middlemen taking a cut on the way. Some of that already works. Some of it is a pitch deck with a nice font. I want to be able to tell you which is which.

There is a bigger thing underneath all of this. We are losing the ability to make sense of the world together. Not because people got less intelligent, but because we are each working from different pieces, in different feeds, at different speeds, and the times are divisive enough that we have stopped assuming good faith about the gap. A society that cannot work things out together cannot decide anything together either. So the point is not only to inform people. It is to bring us closer to each other, and to hand that back to us as something we do in public.

So here is the question I keep coming back to.
If we came together in this moment, what would we want to give our attention to?

That is what we are here to find out. One conversation at a time.

Your turn

So tell me. What should we be paying attention to?

Not rhetorically. If there is something happening where you are, or a thing you keep seeing headlines about and cannot get a straight answer on, send it. We put questions on the board and our contributors go ask them on the street. That is One Question, and it runs on what people send in.

– Maceo Whatley
Founder · We Them Media · August 24, 2026

This is what I say. Here are the seven standards we hold ourselves to, starting with the one that says every rule applies to me before it applies to anyone else on the team.

One of those standards says we name where AI was used. So: most of the sentences on this page were shaped by an AI working from notes and fragments I wrote. The thinking is mine. A lot of the prose is not. I am learning to write again, and from here the AI is an editor that tells me when a sentence is slack, not a ghostwriter that hands me finished paragraphs. I am taking my voice back. You will be able to watch that happen here. The same disclosure for the rest of the site is with our standards.